وَلَقَدْ خَلَقْنَا الْإِنسَانَ مِن سُلَالَةٍ مِّن طِينٍ ﴿١٢﴾ ثُمَّ جَعَلْنَاهُ نُطْفَةً فِي قَرَارٍ مَّكِينٍ ﴿١٣﴾ ثُمَّ خَلَقْنَا النُّطْفَةَ عَلَقَةً فَخَلَقْنَا الْعَلَقَةَ مُضْغَةً فَخَلَقْنَا الْمُضْغَةَ عِظَامًا فَكَسَوْنَا الْعِظَامَ لَحْمًا ثُمَّ أَنشَأْنَاهُ خَلْقًا آخَرَ ۚ فَتَبَارَكَ اللَّهُ أَحْسَنُ الْخَالِقِينَ ﴿١٤﴾
“Man We did create from a quintessence (of clay); then We placed him as (a drop of sperm) in a place of rest, firmly fixed; then We made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood; then of that clot We made a (foetus) lump; then we made out of that lump bones and clothed the bones with flesh; then we developed out of it another creature. So blessed be Allah, the best to create!”
Qur'an 23:12–14 · translation: A. Yusuf Ali (1934)The words “clot of congealed blood” in older English translations render the Arabic ‘alaqah. The root ʿ-l-q means to hang, cling, or adhere; a derived noun can denote a leech. ‘Alaqah is better rendered “a clinging substance,” not “a blood clot.” This is a lexical point, not a modern revision.
The vocabulary, one term at a time
Nuṭfah (نُطفة) — a small quantity of fluid, a drop. The verse places this drop in a qarār makīn, a settled or firmly fixed resting place: the language of implantation rather than of insemination alone.
‘Alaqah (عَلَقة) — from the root ʿ-l-q, “to cling.” Classical lexica (Ibn Manẓūr, Lisān al-ʿArab) give both “something that clings” and “a leech.” Both senses fit the second week of development: the blastocyst adheres to and invades the endometrium, and its form at this stage is elongated and leech-like.
Muḍghah (مُضْغة) — literally “a morsel, a lump of flesh that has been chewed.” The somites visible on the dorsal surface of the embryo in the fourth and fifth weeks give it a segmented, “chewed” appearance. The image is not decorative; it is descriptive.
What we observe
Human development follows a recognisable sequence in the first eight weeks:
- Days 6–12: implantation; the conceptus adheres to and embeds in the decidua.
- Weeks 2–3: the bilaminar and then trilaminar disc forms; the embryonic–extraembryonic axis is established.
- Weeks 3–4: somites appear in a rostrocaudal sequence; the neural tube closes.
- Weeks 4–6: cartilage models of the limb bones and vertebrae condense; myotomes migrate to invest these models with muscle.
- Weeks 6–8: endochondral ossification begins in the long bones; the embryo acquires recognisably human form.
Points of correspondence
- Implantation is named. Qarār makīn describes a fixed, settled place — the embedded conceptus — rather than a transient deposit.
- Two morphological stages are named correctly. “Clinging” and “chewed lump” are apt descriptors of the late second week and the fourth to fifth week, respectively.
- Bone is clothed with muscle. The verse’s sequence — skeletal elements, then their investment with flesh — mirrors the visible order in which cartilage models are surrounded by migrating myoblasts.
- A further creation is asserted. The final clause refuses to reduce the human being to the sum of these stages.
The passage is a sequence of images, not a timetable: it gives no days, no dimensions, no mechanisms. It does not mention gametes, chromosomes, or gene expression. The order “bones, then flesh” is a fair description of what a careful observer sees, but modern embryology shows that muscle and cartilage precursors arise from the same somitic source and develop concurrently. The verse does not contradict this; it also does not anticipate it. “Another creation” has been read by commentators in several ways and should not be forced into a single biological event.
Why a clinician should care
Because the passage rewards a reader who knows the territory. It is easy to make a verse say more than it says; it is harder to notice that a seventh-century text used words — clinging, chewed, settled — that a modern embryologist would not find embarrassing. That is the whole of the claim. It is not that the Qur'an is a textbook of embryology; it is that its descriptions are not those of a text ignorant of the subject.
Further reading
- K. L. Moore, T. V. N. Persaud, M. G. Torchia, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 11th ed., Elsevier, 2019.
- Ibn Manẓūr, Lisān al-ʿArab, entries for the roots ʿ-l-q, m-ḍ-gh, n-ṭ-f.
- Al-Ṭabarī, Jāmiʿ al-bayān, commentary on Q 23:12–14.
- Al-Rāzī, Mafātīḥ al-ghayb, commentary on Q 23:14.